Dr. Anthony Da Silva Air Force Experience Reinforces the Power of Active Learning
- Dr. Anthony Da Silva

- Jul 23
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 1
For decades, traditional training programs have focused on lectures, slideshows, and reading materials to deliver knowledge. But there's a growing recognition that retention requires more than exposure—it requires application. As someone with both military and human resources leadership experience, I’ve seen firsthand how active learning can transform not just what we know—but what we do.
The model below, adapted from Edgar Dale’s "Cone of Experience," shows a striking truth: we remember far more of what we do than what we read or hear. In fact, the difference between passive and active learning may be the difference between a forgotten workshop and a transformed leader.

Why Passive Learning Falls Short
According to research, people tend to remember:
Only 10% of what they read
20% of what they hear
30% of what they see
This traditional, passive approach to training leads to short-term retention but not long-term transformation. It’s why employees often leave a seminar inspired, but fail to apply anything once they return to work.
The Active Learning Advantage
By contrast, active learning strategies—like role playing, simulations, teaching others, and hands-on experience—can increase retention to 70–90%. The military has practiced this for decades. In my own Air Force journey, training was never just about understanding—it was about executing under pressure, adapting in real time, and mastering readiness through repetition and real-world simulations.
That approach works just as powerfully in corporate and nonprofit settings.
Bloom’s Taxonomy and Real-World Learning
Bloom’s Taxonomy, a widely used framework in education and training, categorizes cognitive skills from basic to advanced:
Remembering – Recalling facts and concepts
Understanding – Explaining ideas
Applying – Using knowledge in new situations
Analyzing – Breaking down and examining
Evaluating – Making judgments and decisions
Creating – Producing new work or ideas
Traditional training often stays stuck in the first two levels—remembering and understanding. But true leadership growth happens at levels three through six, where learners apply, evaluate, and create. That’s where active learning becomes essential.
Military Training: The Ultimate Active Learning Model
During my time in the Air Force, I participated in countless simulations, tactical exercises, and “train-like-you-fight” scenarios. Whether delivering supplies in Iraq or preparing for missions, we trained not by reading about it—but by doing it.

This emphasis on hands-on, real-time learning isn’t exclusive to the military—it’s what every effective organization needs in today’s complex environment. Leaders can’t afford to be theoretical—they need to be adaptive, ready, and practiced.
The SSCG Solution: Flipping the Training Model
At Strategic Synergy Consulting Group, we embed active learning into every course:
Pre-session work prepares learners to engage with concepts before class
Live, interactive sessions focus on hands-on problem-solving
Real-world application tasks ensure the learning sticks
We don’t just ask people to remember. We help them practice, reflect, and transform.
Final Thoughts
Passive learning creates short-lived understanding. Active learning builds lasting leadership. From the battlefield to the boardroom, the power of “doing” cannot be overstated.
My journey through the Air Force experience has solidified this truth: when people apply what they learn, they don’t just improve their skills—they unlock their potential.
If your team is still training the old way, it’s time to rethink your approach. Because in the real world, knowing is not enough—doing is what makes the difference.
About the Author: Dr. Anthony R. Da Silva Air Force Veteran is a multi-site Human Resources professional, former U.S. Air Force service member, and co-founder of Strategic Synergy Consulting Group. His mission is to help individuals and organizations move beyond passive training into purposeful, performance-driven leadership development.
Would you like:




Comments